IJRHNS uses an organized peer review process to assess the academic merit, relevance, novelty, and ethics of the research articles submitted for publication.

Step 1: Manuscript Submission

Manuscripts are submitted by the authors via the journal's submission system.

Step 2: Initial Editorial Screening

The editorial office checks:

• Scope and relevance.
• Originality.
• Ethical compliance.
• Methodological quality.
• Language and presentation.
• Submission requirements.

Those that fail to meet minimum standards will either be revised or rejected.

Step 3: Reviewer Selection

Those that pass the first stage of evaluation are forwarded to independent experts who are knowledgeable in the field.

Step 4: Double Blind Reviewing

In this step, the manuscript is reviewed without revealing the identity of either the reviewer or the author.

Reviewers assess:

• Scientific merit.
• Originality.
• Research significance.
• Methodological rigor.
• Ethical soundness.
• Clarity and organization.
• Contribution to the field.

Step 5: Editorial Decision

The possible decisions are:

• Accept
• Minor Revisions
• Major Revisions
• Reject

Step 6: Revision

If revision becomes necessary, then the author must be careful and deal with all the issues mentioned in the reviews.

Step 7: Evaluation

The revised paper is once again evaluated by the editor and reviewers.

Step 8: Publication

When the manuscript is finally accepted, it is then published.

The current review-process page states that, under normal circumstances, the complete peer-review process is expected to take approximately two weeks, while maintaining the journal's stated standards for scholarly review.